⚖ EU Gambling Regulations

Sports Betting Sponsorship in EU Football: Regulations, Bans, and Shirt Advertising Rules

An in-depth examination of how European Union member states regulate gambling sponsorships in professional football, from shirt advertising and stadium naming rights to perimeter boards and broadcast integrations.

Key Takeaways

Complete Bans: Italy (since 2019) and Poland prohibit all gambling sponsorship in sport; Belgium phases out by January 2028
Partial Restrictions: Spain, Germany, Netherlands, and France allow sponsorships with strict conditions on content, placement, and responsible gambling messaging
Financial Impact: Italian Serie A lost approximately EUR 100 million annually; Premier League clubs receive GBP 60-100 million from gambling sponsors
Trend Direction: Consistent movement toward stricter regulation across Europe, with voluntary restrictions emerging in unregulated markets

Introduction: Football and Gambling Sponsorship

Professional football and gambling have developed an extensive commercial relationship across Europe over the past two decades. Betting companies became major sponsors of clubs, leagues, and tournaments, with their logos appearing on shirts, stadium advertising boards, and in broadcast integrations. According to data from the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), sports betting represents a significant segment of the licensed gambling market in most EU member states, making football sponsorship attractive for operator visibility.

However, this commercial relationship has faced increasing scrutiny from regulators, public health advocates, and politicians concerned about the normalization of gambling, particularly among young football fans. As documented in our comprehensive guide to Gambling Advertising Bans and Restrictions in the EU, several countries have moved to restrict or ban gambling advertising in sport, with football sponsorships receiving particular attention due to their visibility and reach.

This article examines the current regulatory landscape for gambling sponsorships in European football, analyzing country-by-country rules, the financial implications for clubs, and emerging trends that will shape future partnerships.

Countries with Complete Sponsorship Bans

Italy: The Decreto Dignita Model

Italy implemented one of Europe's most comprehensive gambling sponsorship bans through the Decreto Dignita (Dignity Decree) in 2018, which took full effect from July 2019. The legislation, sponsored by then-Deputy Prime Minister Luigi Di Maio, prohibited all forms of gambling advertising and sponsorship in Italian territory, including:

The ban is enforced by AGCOM (Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni), the Italian communications authority, with significant financial penalties for violations. According to ADM (Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli), the Italian gambling regulator, operators have faced enforcement actions for attempting indirect advertising through social media or international broadcasts viewable in Italy.

Financial Impact on Italian Football

The Decreto Dignita significantly impacted Italian football club revenues. Serie A clubs collectively lost an estimated EUR 100 million annually in gambling sponsorship income. Major clubs like Roma, Inter Milan, and Napoli had to terminate lucrative betting partnerships. Clubs pivoted to alternative sponsors in technology, retail, and cryptocurrency sectors, though replacement deals often proved less valuable than the gambling contracts they replaced.

Poland: State Monopoly and Private Operator Advertising Ban

Poland maintains a state monopoly on online casino gambling through Totalizator Sportowy, and prohibits private operators from advertising gambling services. This extends to sports sponsorships, meaning Polish football clubs cannot enter into shirt sponsorship agreements with private betting companies. Only the state-owned operator can conduct gambling advertising, though such sponsorships remain limited in practice.

Belgium: Phased Prohibition (2023-2028)

Belgium implemented comprehensive gambling advertising restrictions in 2023, including sports sponsorship limitations. The Belgian approach introduces a transitional period allowing professional sports associations to continue displaying gambling brand names and logos on player clothing and at sporting venues until January 1, 2028. After this date, all gambling sponsorship in Belgian sport will be prohibited.

The Belgian Gaming Commission (Kansspelcommissie) oversees compliance with these restrictions. During the transition period, sponsorships must comply with content requirements including prominent responsible gambling messaging and prohibitions on targeting minors. For more on Belgian gambling regulation, see our EU Country Index.

Countries with Strict Restrictions

Spain: DGOJ Regulatory Framework

Spain introduced significant gambling advertising restrictions under Royal Decree 958/2020, which came into force in 2021. The Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ) enforces these rules, which include specific provisions for sports sponsorship:

Spanish La Liga clubs have retained some gambling partnerships, though the time-based advertising restrictions have reduced sponsor exposure during peak viewership periods. This has led to renegotiation of some sponsorship deals to reflect decreased visibility.

Germany: The GlüStV 2021 Framework

Germany's Interstate Treaty on Gambling (Glücksspielstaatsvertrag 2021) permits gambling sponsorships in football but imposes comprehensive conditions. The Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) oversees advertising compliance, requiring:

Bundesliga clubs have maintained relationships with licensed betting operators, though several clubs have voluntarily moved away from gambling sponsors due to fan pressure and corporate responsibility considerations. Bayern Munich notably rejected gambling sponsorship offers despite their financial value.

For detailed information on German gambling regulation, see our dedicated Germany Country Page.

Netherlands: KSA Enforcement

The Netherlands, which opened its legal online gambling market in 2021, permits sponsorships by licensed operators under supervision of the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA). The Dutch regulator has taken a strict approach to advertising compliance:

The KSA has issued significant fines to operators violating advertising rules, creating compliance pressure that extends to sponsorship activities. Eredivisie clubs must carefully structure partnerships to ensure regulatory compliance. For more details, consult our Netherlands Country Page.

Types of Football Sponsorship Affected

Shirt Sponsorships

Front-of-shirt sponsorships represent the most visible and valuable form of football sponsorship. Gambling operators have paid premium rates for this placement due to television exposure and media coverage. In markets with bans (Italy, Poland, Belgium by 2028), shirt sponsorships are prohibited entirely. In restricted markets (Spain, Germany, Netherlands), shirt sponsors must comply with advertising regulations including responsible gambling messaging requirements.

Country Shirt Sponsorship Status Key Conditions
Italy Banned Complete prohibition since July 2019
Belgium Phase-Out Permitted until January 2028, then banned
Poland Banned Private operator advertising prohibited
Spain Restricted Licensed operators only; strict content rules
Germany Permitted Licensed operators; responsible gambling messaging required
Netherlands Restricted Licensed operators; untargeted advertising rules
France Restricted Licensed operators; sports betting only (no casino)

Stadium Naming Rights

Stadium naming rights from gambling operators follow similar regulatory patterns to shirt sponsorships, though they often receive less media attention. In Italy, stadium naming rights from gambling companies are prohibited under the Decreto Dignita. In regulated markets like Germany and Spain, stadium naming deals must comply with general advertising restrictions.

Examples of gambling stadium naming deals in regulated markets include betting company sponsorships of training facilities and secondary venues, though major stadium naming rights remain less common due to regulatory complexity and brand considerations.

Perimeter Advertising and LED Boards

Pitch-side advertising through static or LED boards falls under broadcast advertising regulations in most jurisdictions. This creates complexity for international broadcasts, as content shown during matches may be visible in countries with stricter regulations than the venue country. UEFA and national federations have developed technical solutions including virtual advertising replacement for international feeds.

Training Kit and Merchandise Sponsorship

Training kit sponsorships typically face the same restrictions as match-day shirt sponsorships. Merchandise partnerships (such as limited edition gambling-branded merchandise) are generally prohibited in countries with comprehensive advertising bans and restricted in regulated markets.

Cross-Border Broadcasting Considerations

International football broadcasting creates unique compliance challenges when matches from countries permitting gambling sponsorships are broadcast to countries with advertising bans. Key considerations include:

The UEFA has addressed these concerns through commercial partner guidelines that acknowledge national regulatory differences. For European competitions, sponsors must ensure compliance with regulations in all broadcast markets or implement technical solutions to prevent prohibited advertising exposure.

The UK Perspective: Voluntary Restrictions

While the United Kingdom is no longer an EU member state, the Premier League's approach to gambling sponsorship influences European discussions. The league implemented a "whistle-to-whistle" voluntary ban on gambling advertising during live match broadcasts in 2019, meaning no gambling ads are shown from five minutes before kickoff until five minutes after the final whistle.

Premier League clubs have discussed potential voluntary front-of-shirt sponsorship restrictions, with some clubs abandoning gambling sponsors. According to UK Gambling Commission data, gambling sponsorship remains significant in English football but faces increasing political and public pressure for restriction. This voluntary approach may influence EU markets considering similar measures before implementing binding regulations.

Alternative Sponsorship Strategies

Clubs affected by gambling sponsorship bans have pursued alternative partnerships across several sectors:

Technology and Cryptocurrency

Technology companies and cryptocurrency platforms have emerged as major alternative sponsors, particularly in Italy post-Decreto Dignita. However, cryptocurrency sponsorships face their own regulatory scrutiny, with some jurisdictions concerned about promoting volatile assets to football fans.

Retail and Consumer Goods

Traditional consumer brands in retail, automotive, and financial services sectors have increased football sponsorship presence. These partnerships typically offer lower valuations than gambling deals but provide greater regulatory stability.

Regional and International Diversification

Some clubs have structured sponsorship deals that maintain gambling partnerships for markets where advertising remains legal while securing alternative sponsors for regions with restrictions. This requires complex commercial and compliance arrangements.

Esports and Emerging Considerations

The growth of esports presents new sponsorship questions, particularly given younger audience demographics. As examined in our guides to CS2 & Skin Gambling in the EU and Skin Gambling vs Esports Betting, the distinction between regulated esports betting and unregulated skin gambling affects sponsorship possibilities.

Football clubs with esports divisions must consider whether gambling sponsorships extending to esports operations comply with youth protection regulations. Several jurisdictions specifically prohibit gambling advertising in contexts likely to reach minors, potentially limiting esports sponsorship integration.

Future Regulatory Trends

Several developments indicate continued movement toward stricter gambling sponsorship regulation across Europe:

For operators and clubs navigating this landscape, understanding both current regulations and likely future developments is essential for commercial planning. Our EU Gambling Compliance Risk Assessor tool can help assess regulatory risks across different markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which EU countries have banned gambling shirt sponsorships in football?

Italy implemented a complete ban on gambling sponsorships in sport under the 2018 Decreto Dignita, effective from July 2019. Belgium banned most gambling advertising including sports sponsorship in 2023, with a transition period allowing professional sports associations to display brand names on player clothing until January 2028. Spain heavily restricts gambling sponsorship with strict guidelines on placement and content. Poland prohibits gambling advertising entirely for private operators, effectively banning sponsorships.

Can betting companies sponsor football clubs in Germany?

Yes, betting companies can sponsor football clubs in Germany, but under strict conditions set by the Interstate Treaty on Gambling (GlüStV 2021). Sponsorships must not target minors, must include responsible gambling messaging, and operators must hold a valid German license. The GGL oversees compliance. However, several clubs have voluntarily moved away from gambling sponsors due to reputational concerns and fan pressure.

How much revenue do football clubs lose from gambling sponsorship bans?

The financial impact varies significantly by league. Italian Serie A clubs collectively lost an estimated EUR 100 million annually after the 2019 Decreto Dignita ban. In the UK Premier League, gambling companies account for approximately GBP 60-100 million per year in shirt sponsorship deals. Belgian clubs face reduced sponsorship revenue as the 2028 deadline approaches. Clubs typically need to find alternative sponsors from technology, retail, or cryptocurrency sectors, though replacement deals often prove less valuable.

Are stadium naming rights from betting companies allowed in the EU?

Stadium naming rights from betting companies are banned in countries with comprehensive gambling advertising prohibitions like Italy and Poland. In Belgium, stadium naming deals are permitted until 2028 under transitional rules. Germany, Spain, and other regulated markets allow stadium naming rights but subject them to the same advertising restrictions as other gambling marketing, including responsible gambling messaging requirements and prohibitions on targeting minors.

Legal Disclaimer

This article provides general information for educational and research purposes only. Sponsorship regulations change frequently and vary by jurisdiction. This content does not constitute legal advice. Organizations should consult with qualified legal counsel and verify current regulations with relevant regulatory authorities before entering into sponsorship agreements.

Related Resources

Last Updated: December 2025